Member’s paper

Go to all Publications

Type of Paper publication
Title: Normothermic Ex Vivo Kidney Perfusion Improves Early DCD Graft Function Compared With Hypothermic Machine Perfusion and Static Cold Storage.
Authors: Urbanellis P, Hamar M, Kaths JM, Kollmann D, Linares I, Mazilescu L, Ganesh S, Wiebe A, Yip PM, John R, Konvalinka A, Mucsi I, Ghanekar A, Bagli DJ, Robinson LA, Selzner M.
Conference:
Year: 2020
Journal:
Volume
Issue
Page(s)
Abstract* Background: Better preservation strategies for the storage of donation after circulatory death grafts are essential to improve graft function and to increase the kidney donor pool. We compared continuous normothermic ex vivo kidney perfusion (NEVKP) with hypothermic anoxic machine perfusion (HAMP) and static cold storage (SCS) in a porcine kidney autotransplantation model. Methods: Porcine kidneys were exposed to 30 minutes of warm ischemia and then reimplanted following either 16 hours of either SCS, HAMP (LifePort 1.0), or NEVKP before autotransplantation (n = 5 per group). The contralateral kidney was removed. Animals were followed for 8 days. Results: Grafts preserved by NEVKP demonstrated improved function with more rapid recovery compared with HAMP and SCS (mean peak serum creatinine: 3.66 ± 1.33 mg/dL [postoperative d 1 [(POD1)], 8.82 ± 3.17 mg/dL [POD2], and 12.90 ± 2.19 mg/dL [POD3], respectively). The NEVKP group demonstrated significantly increased creatinine clearance calculated on POD3 (63.6 ± 19.0 mL/min) compared with HAMP (13.5 ± 10.3 mL/min, P = 0.001) and SCS (4.0 ± 2.6 mL/min, P = 0.001). Histopathologic injury scores on POD8 were lower in both perfused groups (NEVKP and HAMP, score: 1-1.5) compared with SCS (score: 1-3, P = 0.3), without reaching statistical significance. Conclusions: NEVKP storage significantly improved early kidney function compared with both cold preservation strategies, although HAMP also demonstrates improvement over SCS. NEVKP may represent a novel, superior preservation option for donation after circulatory death renal grafts compared with conventional hypothermic methods.
Link View Paper Online
Publication File* No File Attached
DCAP: No File Attached
Presentation No File Attached
Published?
Expected Publishing Date
Grant Number none
Reb Number*
Accepted: yes
Do File: No File Attached